Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: ssugasl231
5 Extending unemployment insurance costs $56 billion over 10 years, or $5.6 billion/year.

I am so confused about unemployment insurance. Can somebody explain it to me?

I thought business owners paid a premium to the states to provide a max 26-week unemployment insurance policy to employees. Isn't this a state program? And, if this part of the compensation is run like a true insurance program, presumably there was a pot of money accruing to be paid out on a rainy day. So, if a state is really hurting, employment-wise, what prevents a state from adding a temporary, beyond-26-week, supplemental policy, and structuring the cost appropriately? Why did this become a federal matter and is it being paid for with insurance premiums from employers ... or is it welfare, not insurance at all? And if it is essentially welfare, is there any reason not to make this a loan program rather than a welfare program, so that, in the end, it is at least cost neutral?

12 posted on 12/14/2010 10:45:40 AM PST by JustSurrounded (Repeal it all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JustSurrounded

5 Extending unemployment insurance costs $56 billion over 10 years, or $5.6 billion/year.

I am so confused about unemployment insurance. Can somebody explain it to me?

I thought business owners paid a premium to the states to provide a max 26-week unemployment insurance policy to employees. Isn’t this a state program? And, if this part of the compensation is run like a true insurance program, presumably there was a pot of money accruing to be paid out on a rainy day. So, if a state is really hurting, employment-wise, what prevents a state from adding a temporary, beyond-26-week, supplemental policy, and structuring the cost appropriately? Why did this become a federal matter and is it being paid for with insurance premiums from employers ... or is it welfare, not insurance at all? And if it is essentially welfare, is there any reason not to make this a loan program rather than a welfare program, so that, in the end, it is at least cost neutral?
___________________________

I believe it’s paid some by the state, some by Federal.


22 posted on 12/14/2010 12:10:00 PM PST by ssugasl231
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson