I think we have to go by the best available evidence, which isn’t much. The administrative rules ... posted at the DOH site ... are very compelling. A bunch of anonymous COLBs are not. I know there’s one anomaly that only appeared on the Obama COLB, which I mentioned at one of the sites where Polarik used to post, and then magically new COLBs appeared shortly thereafter with the same anomaly I pointed out. The common denominator for these newer COLBs was Polarik. It was a little too convenient. I can’t conclusively say these newer COLBs aren’t genuine, but there’s no way of proving they ARE genuine.
As for Polarik, I always felt like he was too entrenched in trying to be the one and only guy to prove Obama’s COLB was forged. Either that, or he was trying to create a cover for being on the opposite side of what he claimed. Either way, he’s made himself an unreliable source.
I agree the factlack dot org COLB does not match the original scans from Tommy Vietor. The folds aren’t the clincher, but the paper itself and a mismatching date stamp. Moreover, the EXIF data, which was scrubbed, points to guilty consciences at factlack, not to mentions problems with their story and integrity.
I’ve tried to make time to get back to you. It’s just such a busy time of the year but I do need to talk with you. You said -—
“I know there’s one anomaly that only appeared on the Obama COLB, which I mentioned at one of the sites where Polarik used to post, and then magically new COLBs appeared shortly thereafter with the same anomaly I pointed out”.
I also have seen some problems with Polarik’s analysis of the Obama’s COLBs. I try to read everything about debunking the OBAMA documents but I must have missed your comment about the anomaly. What is it?
“As for Polarik, I always felt like he was too entrenched in trying to be the one and only guy to prove Obama’s COLB was forged”.
Then you should understand why it is self righteous for MT to claim that she is the one and only person to prove Obama’s COLB was forged and accuses that ALL the other COLBs are phonies and the contributors are yahoos and obots.
“I agree the factlack dot org COLB does not match the original scans from Tommy Vietor. The folds aren’t the clincher, but the paper itself and a mismatching date stamp. Moreover, the EXIF data, which was scrubbed, points to guilty consciences at factlack, not to mentions problems with their story and integrity”.
“Factlack”, funny! At first I thought it was a typo.
I agree, the folds aren’t the clincher. But it is the most obvious. That irregularity jumped out at me since my documents have creases resulting from folding the documents in a particular manner before placing in the mailing envelope.
I hope you reply. I come here to learn and you appear to be well informed. And rational.