Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: the_Watchman

You’re right on the money- Carter sowed the seeds for the nighmare muslim radicalism we are seeing right now

If Iran had succeed in becoming an economic success instead of a muslim stronghold then there would be students there shouting for laptops and outsourcing contracts instead of diaper-heads screaming for death to america right now.

When they took over our embassy we sould have bombed the heads of their religious revolution to go collect their virgins.

Notice that about 10 seconds after Ronald Reagan took office, they released the hostages. I firmly believe he made it known that his first act as President would be to leave big smoking holes in the ground where their military bases used to be.


11 posted on 11/22/2010 10:41:56 AM PST by Mr. K (TSA Sexual Assaulters: "You dont get on until we get off")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. K; the_Watchman
If Iran had succeed in becoming an economic success instead of a muslim stronghold then there would be students there shouting for laptops and outsourcing contracts instead of diaper-heads screaming for death to america right now.

Iran WAS an economic success. The Shah was one of America's most loyal allies, then Carter betrayed him for no reason at all.

17 posted on 11/22/2010 10:48:42 AM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. K

Thank you for the more detailed analysis, but my comment was meant to remind people that at the time Nixon approached China there was a viable threat from the Soviet Union.

Whenever you have two enemies who have a falling out, you seek to drive a wedge between them and you consider opportunities to shore up the weaker of the two. This is especially true if their conflict could come to blows. My father used to describe this as the “let’s you and him fight” strategy.

There are lots of Freepers who were not around during these times and are not aware of some of the subtle things which transpired. One of my coworkers last month tried to imply that the Soviet Union had already collapsed at the time of the Nixon presidency. I have no idea where he got this stupid idea. It occurred to me that the left probably promotes this revisionist history in order to (1) give cover to Carter for his idiotic stance toward the Soviet Union and (2) deny any credit to President Ronald Reagan for the subsequent collapse.

A lot of folks never did catch on the fact that the Soviet Union was a much bigger supporter of the North Vietnamese during the war than the Chinese. Going back even further, one of the things that annoys me about the TV program MASH is that they push the allusion that the Chinese were the main backers of the North Koreans when the Soviets were the primary backers as evidenced by peace overtures soon after the death of Stalin and the subsequent internal political instability in the Soviet Union.


25 posted on 11/22/2010 10:58:42 AM PST by the_Watchman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson