My post is long so I’ll list summaries of the numbered paragraphs here and if any para looks skim-worthy, find the full text of the paragraph below the line:
1. Ulsterman carriers Dem water: What a surprise Obama is a failure!
2. I believe Ulsterman is the author of Insider leaks or works with a few others to compose this fiction
3. A few reason why I believe Insider leaks are compositions of rumors/reports from other sources
4. Ulsterman appears to provide ‘cover’ for his interview series.
Ok so if any thing looked worth skimming, find the paragraph number! :)
***************************************************
1. I believe that the overall spin coming from the Dems from now until forever is going to be that they were conned by Obama. They were not conned - they were the conners. I don’t believe anyone as mentally diminished, amoral, and inexperienced as Obama was back when he was being groomed for POTUS could not be recognized. The Dems knew and they didn’t care. The ends justify the means.So the Dems have lost national face for putting a psych-challenged empty suit in the office and they want to ‘choose again’. So Ulsterman carriers the water for the Dems talking ‘shock and awe’ about what a surprise Obama’s character was - well, Dems really should vet their candidates, no? He didn’t cleverly con them - they closed their eyes!
2. I believe that Ulsterman is the writer, at least in part, of these stories which he attributes to ‘Insider’. It reads like fiction composed of tidbits of information pulled together from chauffeurs, hairstylists etc.
Early on, another website which does interview actual WH insiders noted that sources are notoriously fearful of detection and may promise to leak information but never get up the nerve to do so, even over the course of several years etc. So the authors of that website were first to point out the fictional approach that Ulsterman seems to use and the unheard of access he has to the source who just talks and talks and talks.
3. I noticed that one Ulsterman ‘interview’ with the Insider took place for 2 hours in the Insider’s office. How likely is THAT? Yeah, real discrete. Ulsterman refers to receiving emails - again, how likely is it that someone who’s career (already at 30plus years) as a Dem operative would contact blog authors via email? And the breathless, dime store novel-type style reads like fiction. When readers pointed out these weaknesses, the next ‘leak’ was a post that had Insider stressing that HE gives information to Ulsterman in a dialogue that Micky Spillane would have deemed too stilted.
4. I also note that Ulsterman repeatedly tells us how to evaluate the Insider. Many times, I’ve read ‘well what Insider said happened so that proves he is ‘real’ etc.’ No - one could scoop up tidbits of WH gossip and fling ‘em to the the website in a fictionalized account and that wouldn’t make the source who or what Ulsterman says he is or make his amoral motives any more acceptable (Insider initially admitted he was ‘in it’ just to protect Dem pols who deserved better. When readers pointed out this amoral, unpatriotic stance, Insider suddenly went ‘rah rah’ for his country which, he said, he loves etc.)
it reminds me of American Spectator during the Clinton years
Well thought out .. still had enough seeming
previews of what was coming and did to keep me
wondering.
Hey....I don’t know who you ARE, but I think your synopsis of the situation is spot ON. (so, if you think you’re on the ball, I’d have to agree.)
I admire your “interpretation” of the “Insider” series.
It DOES read like fiction....although, fiction we wish were true.
My bubble’s been burst. But, I’m impressed by your take on it.
Someone’s yanking our chain. Smoke and mirrors.
(That’s not to say I don’t think the gay guy isn’t a fraud...we just need honorable people to fess up to the side-show they’ve presented to the American people—all I want for Christmas.....)