Well it is a bit small and blurry, but I have better than 20/20 vision. So not sure if I was seeing something others could not.
I once printed out all my contact information on a business card for my wallet in a font so small that nobody else could read it.
Anyway the point is not that this is IN the Star, but that it WAS in the Star, and over a year later looks like absolute garbage as far as accuracy of prediction.
“Anyway the point is not that this is IN the Star, but that it WAS in the Star, and over a year later looks like absolute garbage as far as accuracy of prediction.”
The Star is one thing. The Enquirer is trashy but it does very careful research and sourcing. Back when I practiced law, I was hired by a celeb to sue them. They had their story solidly sourced and there was no chance of a successful suit.
I would say that, as between a fact stated in the Enquirer and a fact stated in the NYT or on CBS evening news, the fact stated in the Enquirer is more likely to be correct. Enquirer just dresses its facts up like trollops. NYT dresses them up like, well, John Kerry when he’s feeling very serious about himself.