Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: darkwing104; EODGUY; SunkenCiv; neverdem; CholeraJoe; AFPhys; Cyber Liberty

Hate to see it break. But - That’s why you test.

Now - if they made it to a safety factor of 1.25 or 1.55 or 2.55 instead of 1.025 .... It might not break (at least not at that same place!) but it would be able to carry less fuel, less aero electronics, less payload, less armor, smaller engines ... and we’d be back flying the Wright bro’s original airplane.


13 posted on 11/17/2010 5:34:08 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Robert A. Cook, PE; AdmSmith; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; ColdOne; ...

True, true. I’m just glad these craft will never be under any structural stress during operation. ;’)


16 posted on 11/17/2010 6:31:20 PM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson