Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: 1010RD
Privatize the TSA it’s already in the original bill.

No, just dismantle it. There is no need for a universal private security force. Boise International has nothing related to Los Angeles International. Each airline needs to determine what level of security they want to present to passengers, and passengers have to decide if they want to subject themselves to that, or choose another airline. The only thing the federal government can do to actually help the process is to exempt airlines from civil suits based upon discrimination or defamation, and then tack on the end a full financial liability for any terrorist incident that takes place either on or with their property.

Then privatize airports so this nonsense never returns.

Amen to this.

65 posted on 11/16/2010 10:49:33 AM PST by kingu (Favorite Sticker: Lost hope, and Obama took my change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: kingu

We agree, but you don’t have to “dismantle” the TSA at all and actually as conservatives we don’t want to lose the contrast.

In the original enabling bill there’s an opt out provision after two years. All it takes is a few airports - Houston for instance - to opt out and allow private contractors to take over.

With private contractors in place you’ll see an obvious difference.

We cannot quit reminding the public just how bad statism/socialism/liberalism is. When the Soviet Union collapsed it took less than a decade for people to forget the Evil Empire.

Never forget, never again.


74 posted on 11/16/2010 12:14:04 PM PST by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson