Explosive New Justice Department Black Panther Emails (also, USCCR reschedules vote)

Right Side News ^ | November 13, 2010 | Tom Fitton

[jazusamo]

The Obama Department of Justice (DOJ) cannot shake the New Black Panther Party scandal. Every week new revelations emerge about the racism and political favoritism that are corrupting our nation’s top law enforcement agency.

This week, we released to the public brand new documents from the Obama DOJ that provide further evidence that top political appointees at the DOJ were intimately involved in the decision to dismiss the voter intimidation case against the New Black Panther Party.

And just like previous documents we’ve uncovered, this new evidence directly contradicts sworn testimony by Thomas Perez, Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division, who testified before the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights that no political leadership participated in the decision.

Remember this exchange between Perez and the Commission?

COMMISSIONER KIRSANOW: Was there any political leadership involved in the decision not to pursue this particular case any further than it was?

ASST. ATTY. GEN. PEREZ: No. The decisions were made by Loretta King in consultation with Steve Rosenbaum, who is the Acting Deputy Assistant Attorney General.

Perez also suggested that the dispute was merely “a case of career people disagreeing with career people.”

Not true.

The new documents include a series of emails between two political appointees, former Democratic election lawyer and current Deputy Associate Attorney General Sam Hirsch and Associate Attorney General Thomas Perrelli, indicating both DOJ officials were involved in detailed discussions regarding the New Black Panther Party decision. For example, in one April 30, 2009, email from Hirsch to Perrelli, with the subject title “Fw: New Black Panther Party Update,” Hirsch writes:

Tom,

I need to discuss this with you tomorrow morning. I’ll send you another email on this shortly.

If you want to discuss it this evening, please let me know which number to call and when.

Another smoking gun email shows that Hirsch, who worked in the Attorney General’s office, seems to have edited the final order that the DOJ proposed to the court! The proposed order only sought relief against one of the four original defendants.

These emails were put into further context by an updated Vaughn index obtained by Judicial Watch, describing New Black Panther Party documents the Obama DOJ continues to withhold. This document, which was attached to the DOJ’s Motion for Summary Judgment filing in a Judicial Watch lawsuit, includes a description of a May 13 email chain that seems to suggest political appointee Sam Hirsch may have been orchestrating the New Black Panther Party decision.

Acting DAAG [Steven Rosenbaum] advising his supervising Acting AAG [Loretta King] of DASG’s [Hirsch’s] request for a memorandum by the Acting DAAG reviewing various options, legal strategies, and different proposals of relief as related to each separate defendant. Acting DAAG forwarding emails from Appellate Section Chief’s and Appellate Attorney’s with their detailed legal analyses including the application of constitutional provisions and judicial precedent to strategies and relief under consideration in the ongoing NBPP litigation, as well as an assessment of the strength of potential legal arguments, and presenting different possible scenarios in the litigation. [Emphasis added]

Moreover, Hirsch sent an April 30, 2009, email to Steven Rosenbaum (then-Acting Deputy Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights in charge of voting rights) thanking Rosenbaum for “doing everything you’re doing to make sure that this case is properly resolved.” The next day, the DOJ began to reverse course on its New Black Panther Party voter intimidation lawsuit.

Some additional info in article

[jazusamo]

There's been a new meeting scheduled by the USCCR that includes the vote for the Approval of the NBPP Enforcement Report.

I'll bet they'll have a quorum this time, Yaki or no Yaki.

Agenda excerpt:

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

DATE AND TIME: Friday, November 19, 2010; 9:30 a.m. EST

PLACE: 624 Ninth Street, N.W.

Room 540

Washington, DC 20425

MEETING AGENDA

This meeting is open to the public.

I. Approval of Agenda

II. Program Planning

 Approval of New Black Panther Party Enforcement Report

[ElayneJ]

for later

[Bigun]

Marker!

[Brilliant]

They deleted 99% of the emails, and the part that they left was damning. Makes you really want to know what they deleted.

[SumProVita]

Bring this VERY corrupt Department of “Justice” into the FULL light!

[SengirV]

Ping for later use. Thanks

[Venturer]

It is no longer a Department of Justice, It is Obama’s gestap[o with his friend Heinrich Holder running it.

[Venturer]

It is no longer a Department of Justice, It is Obama’s gestapo with his friend Heinrich Holder running it.

[Ann Archy]

it’s the ‘just us’ dept.

[FrdmLvr]

Heinrich Holder. Good one! LOL! And, you are absolutely right.

[Joe Boucher]

If it comes down to a govt overthrow, it will be as a result of crap like this.

Round them all up and goose march them to jail. Obammy, Reid, Pelosi, and ALL their helpers.

[jazusamo]

Yep, especially most of Zer0’s appointed thugs starting with Holder.

[thethirddegree]

Round them all up and goose march them to jail. Obammy, Reid, Pelosi, and ALL their helpers.

Then try them all for treason and mete out Justice, swift and sure.

[Publius6961]

For a federal agency to delete email related to their duties, should be a felony.
If it isn't, that should change.

Plus there is one thing I don't understand. For security, usually daily backups must be stored off site. That's a lot of backups.

If they managed to erase all of them, and the backups, something is rotten in Denmark.

[Brilliant]

I said “deleted” but what I actually meant was “redacted.”

Of course, they might also have deleted emails. I want to see what they redacted, though.