Ron Paul is “correct” in so many issues.
In fact, I partially believe in Paul’s “anti-war” meme to the point that we cannot save World but only ourselves. I believe that Bush strategy in fighting Radical Islam is “incomplete”. In every war, there must always be a “closure”. Either annihilate them all or force them to fully surrender. When Bush “ended” his war in Iraq in 2004 and claimed a “farce victory” by “technically leaving” Iraq and Afghanistan unsettled, it punctuated the failure of his foreign policy, IMHO.
But, Ron Paul is really “poor messenger of his RIGHTFUL message”. But accusing him of being a “loon’ is really unfair to him and unfair to the good message he’s trying to bring into the public attention.
SARAH PALIN IS INDEED A LIBERTARIAN CONSERVATIVE until her ‘fateful’ transformation as “golden woman” of Pro-Life Movement.
Palin ran a Libertarian Conversative platform carrying the brands of “Welfare through efficient government”, anti-corruption, and “Real” free market environment (pro-small business, many players instead of monopoly, true-cost regulation of monopolistic business such as oil) when she defeated all the corrupt establishment in Alaska in 2006.
Palin is just reclaiming her original self and principle.
And YES. PALIN IS THE NEW RON PAUL THAT CAN BE UNDERSTOOD AND FELT BY THE COMMON PEOPLE.
DEMINT/PALIN 2012!
PALIN/DEMINT 2012!
[RON PAUL AS THE CONSTITUTIONAL ADVISOR!]
Agreed.