Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: r9etb

Apology not accepted, only because one was not needed.

But I guess I’ve read way, way too much on TARP over the years to let a sunny assessment, especially by a pundit I have learned to loathe for myriad reasons, stand.

I like Bush just fine, but I’m not going to ever excuse things like NCLB and TARP, just because he’s better than the moron we have in office now.


33 posted on 11/09/2010 1:18:31 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: pissant
Well ... I can understand TARP, if he believed the consensus among his experts, that the alternative was a total collapse of the financial sector.

Given the number of high-profile firms that actually did collapse in that timeframe, there is a certain plausibility to the claim that doing nothing would in fact cause a more general collapse.

Whether or not the experts were correct in their assessment is a matter for debate -- all we have now, is that TARP was passed, no general collapse occurred, and that a certain amount actually has been paid back.

35 posted on 11/09/2010 1:33:02 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson