Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: library user
Has this been photoshopped? I know she is a big gal but this photo really accentuates her big fanny, thigh, legs etc.


40 posted on 11/07/2010 9:01:55 AM PST by daisyscarlett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: daisyscarlett
Nope! That's all Mooshelle.

Only the hat has been photoshopped...


44 posted on 11/07/2010 9:05:59 AM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: daisyscarlett

Bad angle for any woman with even moderate meat on their bones, particularly when your husband is super skinny.


51 posted on 11/07/2010 9:34:41 AM PST by Cathy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: daisyscarlett

I’m not going to comment on Michelle’s size. It’s not the size that determines the effectiveness of a first lady.

However, when I went on a medical mission trip to India, we were told that in India a lady’s legs are covered to her ankles. It’s acceptable to show the belly in a sari, but never the legs. Even the younger ladies who eschewed the saris wore long tunics with full legged ankle length pants. I never saw an Indian woman’s knee or calf the entire time I was there. Even the foreign visitors were covered.

Michelle needs to get better counselors, or start researching this stuff herself. This is simple to find out using any travel book or even Google.


65 posted on 11/09/2010 6:58:24 AM PST by keats5 (Not all of us are hypnotized.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson