The Bush/Gore situation in Florida in 2000 was not an irregularity that benefited the Republicans. It was a Democrat-caused set of irregularities intended to harm the Republicans that the US Supreme Court put an end to after the Florida Supreme Court brazenly demonstrated its corruption.
Thus, your analysis as is contains a significant bias in favor of the Democrats.
“Thus, your analysis as is contains a significant bias in favor of the Democrats.”
I think the author cited the Bush/Gore recount in Florida to preempt any trolls who wanted to whine about it. I don’t get the feeling that the article is pro-democrat at all.