Let me say right away that Mr. Apuzzo has good reason to be a little "sensitive" after what Jedi Pauly wrote.
Now, I'm the kind of guy that doesn't have a problem separating the wheat from the chaff.
I think there were many good ideas in Pauly's article.
Unfortunately, it could have been a far better article without him trying to denigrate those on the front line of battle -- such as, Mr. Apuzzo.
Again, bringing up Mr. Apuzzo (and the other "birther" lawyers)detracted -- unfortunately, I think -- from some of the good points that he made.
In retrospect, I wonder if I did good by posting the article at all.
I certainly did not intend to be part of demeaning Mr. Apuzzo: who has demonstrated, even with just a few posts on this forum, a wonderful grasp of the constitution and the history of our republic.
There is a way to criticize in a constructive and tactful way.
There is a way to disagree, without being disagreeable.
I do not know what Mr. Apuzzo has done to be treated in such a dismissive and disrespectful manner -- and I don't like it!
As I said, Mr. Apuzzo is on the front line of battle here.
There are also thousands of us behind the scenes.
But whether we are at the front, or at the back of the battle, we are ALL on the same team... thus we should be heartening, not disparaging, Mr. Apuzzo.
Again, Mr. Apuzzo has good reason to be a little sensitive after what Jedi Pauly -- unnecessarily in my opinion -- wrote.
In fact, I think he has shown a commendable restraint.
STE=Q
Keep in mind that infighting among ourselves gives comfort to the enemy.
Let’s focus on how we can get the usurper out of the White House before he destroys what’s left of our republic.
Any way, I’m tired and need to hit the sack.
Good night all!
STE=Q