What a crock.
Why does this guy ignore the U.S. law of the early 20th century which goes a long way toward defining what is - and is not - a “natural born citizen?”
Without that law, those like John McCain who were born outside our borders but in U.S. possessions would also not qualify to be President.
“Why does this guy ignore the U.S. law of the early 20th century which goes a long way toward defining what is - and is not - a ‘natural born citizen’?”
However, he draws a distinction between “Natural Law” (”creator” endowed) and Positive Law (man Made), as follows:
“There exists a Natural Law jurisdiction from which we derive our Natural Rights which are an endowment from Nature, and Natural Rights are unalienable.
There exists a Positive Law jurisdiction from which we derive our Legal Rights, and legal rights are privileges. Positive Law means man-made statutory law from the Latin root “posit” which means that which is declared and agreed to. It is sometimes referred to as “decreed law” under a monarchy political system.
Natural Law is defined to be opposite or opposed to the Positive Law.
Political Rights are Natural Rights which are Inherited from our Fathers (Declaration of Independence).”
STE=Q