Posted on 11/03/2010 8:08:40 AM PDT by exit82
She is a really decent person, and her character shown through. Coons, on the other hand is an insufferable boor, vindictive, too.
But the liberal media couldn’t be bothered with reporting examples of that, now, could they?
She’s cute. Think she’ll date me?
And an Amen from me. I too have met Christine O’Donnell on more than one occassion. She is a geniuine person who is deeply concerned about the state and its people.
Frankly, Christine O’Donnell is too good for Delaware. They deserve Coons and his tax increases. At no time did he address issues of concern, but attack he did, on the most trivial things.
And the RINOs who stabbed her in the back, It ain’t over yet. We’re coming for you.
There are just some states that will elect 'Rats no matter what. Look at places like CA. The place is falling apart and they keep on beating themselves over the head and electing 'Rats. Same with NY. Those kind of places need to hit absolute rock bottom before anyone other than a 'Rat has a chance. NJ kind of went through that last year. MI went through it this year.
Do you know she was the Republican candidate for senator in 2008? What did she become unqualified since then?
I, too, can’t figure out some Americans. Is it Stockholm Syndrome? Why can’t they vote in their obvious best interests?
I really think our educational system has accomplished its real mission.
She is certainly qualified, according to the Constitution.
Cute had nothing to do with it. She was smarter, and more correct on the issues than Coons.
She was certainly prepared to go to DC and be a Senator and vote against Cap and Trade.
I don’t understand your thinking. Neither does Al Franken.
Now I see why Psalm 144 is your nick. Excellent.
Did she win? Did she even have a college degree then? Had she ever held a significant elected office then? She is cute though.
That's a stretch. They base their story on exit polling. It's no surprise that those who left their homes to actually vote would skew favorably to Coons. There is absolutely no method of determining if Castle would have won in Christine's place.
Don't get me wrong; I wanted her to win, and prefer strong conservatives to run rather than the Castles of the world, but it's a bit silly to assume Castle would have lost. But I doubt a Castle win would have been satisfying at any rate. Better to have sent the message within the GOP that conservatives will be favored in the primaries.
Thanks for the prayers, and for all of your pings, too, during the campaign. Didn’t get a chance to respond to all of them, but appreciated them nonetheless.
Saw Christine up close with the farmers here when the Delaware Farm Bureau gave her their endorsement. They loved her, and farmers know bullcrap when they see it.
They didn’t see ANY that day.
Thanks. May the makers increase and the takers decrease....
Bless you! Gave me a much needed LOL!
I think you made a great point. She was the point person and took a lot of heat that would have been directed against other conservative candidates.
Yes, and the same results.
Well, hopefully RINOs will be now be on the endangered species list.
Well she was a poor candidate.
She lost. I don’t even care that Coons won, better him than Castle.
Looking back I now wish that Lowden had won in NV. She would have beat Harry Reid.
There was nothing wrong with her, she was a conservative. I think we need to learn a lesson from these losses.
She sure did do good(sic).
I know I could not have handled what she did with such grace and poise.
Thanks for your help, Reddy. She showed Castle the door, and exposed Tokyo Rove as a RINO clown.
This was a time for choosing, and some Pubbies failed the test.
This was business, not personal...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.