Flaky after-Birther, we are back to "Kind" again?
Already answered. To repeat:
- - - -
You: "Highlighted was the definition of “Kind” that meant “race”, and that was in response to me asking if by “Kind” he meant race. Yes, by “Kind” he meant race."
" It's highlighted because that's what Google Books does when you do a keyword search on their database. BP1 didn't highlight it using Photoshop or any other program. And his keywords search in that page-grab image so clearly shows that it was "natural kind."
His search was not "white kind" or "brown kind" or "purple kind" or "psychedelic kind" - it was 'natural kind.' "
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2620065/posts?page=85#85
- - - - -
You do see the search term "natural kind" in bold and underlined above - don't you?
0bama is not of our “Kind”, he is not “White”, he is not completely the descendant of the Europeans who settled and founded this nation - and thus not even really an American!
"0bama is not of our “Kind”, he is not “White”” ?
How did your brain turn "natural kind" into "0bama is not of our “Kind”, he is not “White” ”?
You should get out of leftist field. It is not healthy being there.
“It is possible the Founders limited the President to the descendants of the White Europeans who formed the country.”
“1926 Bouvier Law Dictionary..American is defined..descendants from Europeans who were born in the US.”
“Can Obama say he has kindred blood with the Founders..with..the majority of United States citizens?”
Into EXACTLY what it is; An argument that only “White Europeans” should be President, and that 0bama is not an American because he is not completely descended from Europeans, and that those who are not of the same “kindred blood” cannot claim to be American or claim the Presidency.