[bushpilot1]

“Sir Thomas More’s Life of Richard the Third. He tells us that Richard calculated by murdering his two nephews in the Tower to make himself accounted “a kindly king”—not certainly a ‘kindly’ one in our present usage of the word[204];

but, having put them out of the way, that he should then be lineal heir of the Crown, and should thus be reckoned[185]

as king by kind or natural descent; and such was of old the constant use of the word.”

(204) [The two words are intimately related, ‘king’, contracted for kining (Anglo-Saxon cyn-ing), ‘son of the kin’ or ‘tribe’, one of the people, cognate with cynde, true-born, native, ‘kind’, and cynd, nature ‘kind’, whence ‘kindly’, natural.]

connecting the dots..the word true-born

http://www.gutenberg.org/files/20900/20900-h/20900-h.htm#Page_184

[patlin]

It won't matter what you put up as these drones think in nature, the soil is the parent that gives life & birth, not man that was created in the image of God. It's actually pretty logical when you really think about it from their point of view...

In the beginning, God created....Then God said "Let Us make man in Our image"....And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground.