[PSYCHO-FREEP]

How about that Uhh, Uhh, Uhh, Uhh, fake laugh of his? And his repeated phrases and paragraphs that are meant to give his small little brain time to work while he is giving a list of issues?

I can't stand his shows either. I always wind up frustrated with his lack of delivery. But what puzzles me most is, why on Earth is he at this level? He is quite boring and unentertaining. I think that Rush has had something to do with Hannity’s success.

Most of Rush's audience stays on to see what else is on the Conservative news agenda and they just tolerate Hannity because there is nothing better to listen to.

[Mobties]

“I think that Rush has had something to do with Hannity’s success.”

---

Indeed he has. Limbaugh's three hour show immediately precedes, and therefore transfers audience to, Hannity’s. Moreover, Rush often refers to his own show as “show prep” for the rest of the media.

[pgyanke]

Most of Rush's audience stays on to see what else is on the Conservative news agenda and they just tolerate Hannity because there is nothing better to listen to.

Hey, you just described me! Do we know each other...?

[MayflowerMadam]

“I think that Rush has had something to do with Hannity’s success.”

Rush had everything to do with Hannity’s success. Sean only became popular when Rush started using him as guest host. I heard him sub for Rush around 1999-2000 and he was excellent.

[albie]

Hannity gets huge women numbers. They like his approach to people, whether they’re libs or pubs. Plus they think he’s “cute”. He’s the opposite of Levin and savage who get big male numbers which is most of the talk audience.

[manic4organic]

He always says “...in great specificity AND detail.” Aaaaarghh!