[r9etb]

Your point about the media/liberal elite not being able to help themselves is a good one though. These people don't understand the American public, they hate religion and religious people, they look down on regular folks - and yes, even if they were shooting themselves in the foot my guess is your right that they would still keep up with making fun of COD.

The question being ... why are they piling on O'Donnell and not, say, Rossi or Fiorina?

That's obvious, even if her ardent supporters don't want to see it: it's because O'Donnell is an easy mark and the others are not. She doesn't come across like a Senator -- she's soft; and she seems shallow, hesitant, and very, very young.

Is that fair? No ... but it's real life in the media-dominated political world.

[truthfreedom]

She’s very pretty. She would be a very young very pretty very prolife female.

That scares the Democrats.

Do you remember that she was the star of the Values Voter convention back in September?

She’s a star. Rossi and Fiorina are not stars.

People know who she is. And a lot more of them than you think do like her.

Based on her performances in the debates, she should have rock solid conservative support. They will be voting for her. Earlier polls pre debate, had less than full conservative support. Conservatives will be voting, and they will be voting for Christine. “Where in the first amendment?” was huge for conservatives.

[FreeReign]

The question being ... why are they piling on O'Donnell and not, say, Rossi or Fiorina? That's obvious, even if her ardent supporters don't want to see it: it's because O'Donnell is an easy mark and the others are not.

O'Donnell is tea party while Rossi and Fiorina are not. Obviously the libs would rather pile on tea party type candidates.

You don't see that.