There is no doubt that the first certificate doesn’t contain the necessary information. But if you compare it to the other two, it’s because an entire line is missing, not just a few words. And because of that, the remaining sentence is ungrammatical: “...are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the National Democratic Party balloting at the Presidential Preference Poll and Caucus...” If I weren’t a conspiracy theorist, I’d conclude it was probably just a simple cut-and-paste error—the same sort of computer error that left the island of birth information off that other Freeper’s form. I mean, I’d expect a conspiracy powerful enough to swap out microfiche in libraries across the country to at least be able to edit a sentence properly.
If it was an "error," nothing would have stopped the Hawaiian DNC party to resubmit the certification statement to include the US Constitutional and chosen by the state language to fulfill the Hawaiian law. The maximum time to fix it could have taken about 2 minutes and that's a stretch.