CA Voters Guide

CA Voters Guide ^ | 10/1/2010 | DoctorZin

[DoctorZIn]

To all my old friends on FR...
Hello!

I hope a few of you can use this simple blog I created for the CA election

[stocksthatgoup]

Thank you!

[stylin_geek]

http://www.tommcclintock.com/blog/tom-mcclintock-on-the-propositions

Rep. Tom McClintock’s guide to the propositions.

[pollywog]

Ditto’s on the Thank You.....

[Mark]

There is a guide on the judges on the ballot also— very helpful.(I found it through Google)

[DoctorZIn]

Thanks, I added it.

[Pan_Yans Wife]

Great to see you again, DoctorZIn! I hope this means we’ll see more of you here. Best wishes to you!

[DoctorZIn]

Thanks

[AEMILIUS PAULUS]

Thanks for the reference to McClintock’s site. My votes matched his advice.

[Navy Patriot]

Thanks Doc, it's a great help, I can now zot the socialist activist judges and retain the fewer constructionist ones.

Still unsure about Prop 22.

[nuconvert]

Hello

[Bernard Marx]

Very helpful, especially on the judges. Thank you! It’s bookmarked and will be forwarded to every conservative voter I know.

[excopconservative]

Here are some recommendations from Mother Lode Tea Party

Review and Recommendations
California
Statewide Propositions for November 2010
Proposition Recommendation

19 Marijuana
Legaliza and tax marijuana NO

20 Elections
Congressional district lines to be redrawn by a
committee YES

21 Increase vehicle license fees by $18 a year to fund state
parks NO

22 State government prohibited from taking designated
type of local funds NO

23 Suspend AB 32, the “Global Warming solutions Act”
Environment until unemployment falls below 5.5% YES

24 Eliminates three business tax breaks NO

25 State budget and tax increases can be passed with a simple majority vote, rather than current two-thirds
requirement NO

26 Voters must give permission before any new taxes can
be imposed YES

27 Return task of redistricting to the California State Legislature (repealing Proposition 11) NO

[Persevero]

I have received conflicting reports on the judges.

One site rates them low on the conservative scale, and recommends “no.”

Another site says they supported Prop 8 as constitutional, and recommends “yes.”

Any thoughts?

[Sergio]

Voting soon bookmark.

[DoctorZIn]

which sites are conflicting on the judges?

[ErnBatavia]

This thread is as good as any....we're two weeks away from the election, and nobody around my 'hood has gotten their sample ballots yet -- and these are the ones that tell you where your precinct will vote.

I'm getting goosey.

[Homer_J_Simpson]

Thanks for the McClintock link. I have been looking for it. He has the right attitude, the right philosophy, and he has been in California politics long enough to know both the unintended consequences and the intended damage to our way life hidden in these propositions. I could do a lot worse than following his recommendations without further researching the issues. Not that I won't.

Just for grins I think I will compare his recommendations with the ones my wife gets from the CTA. Probably 100% opposite.

[Persevero]

Judge Voter Guide

http://www.judgevoterguide.com/#san-francisco-county

does not recommend the Supreme Court nominees

vs. the one McClintock linked to in an email I got, which recommended that they be confirmed because the supported Prop 8.

Any insights would be helpful.