Chris Coons can’t name the five freedoms in the First Amendment

Michelle Malkin ^ | 10-19-2010 | Michelle Malkin

[MarkLevinFan]

That’s right. Delaware Democratic Senate candidate Chris Coons can’t name the five freedoms in the First Amendment.

But all you’ll hear from the MSM today is that Christine O’Donnell — correctly — questioned Coons’ claim that the phrase “the separation of church and state” appears in the First Amendment.

Delaware GOP Senate nominee Christine O’Donnell questioned on Tuesday whether the Constitution provides for the separation of church and state.

The comment came during a debate on WDEL radio with Democratic opponent Chris Coons, who argued that local schools should teach science rather than religion, at which point O’Donnell jumped in. “Where in the Constitution is the separation of church and state?” she asked.

The audience at Widener Law School was taken aback, with shouts of “whoa” and laughter coming from the crowd.

Coons then pointed to the First Amendment, which states: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”

“You’re telling me the First Amendment does?” O’Donnell interrupted to ask.

Following the next question, Coons revisited the remark — likely thinking he had caught O’Donnell in a flub — saying, “I think you’ve just heard from my opponent in her asking ‘where is the separation of church and state’ show that she has a fundamental misunderstanding.”

“That’s in the First Amendment?” O’Donnell again asked.

“Yes,” Coons responded.

O’Donnell was later able to score some points of her own off the remark, revisiting the issue to ask Coons if he could identify the “five freedoms guaranteed in the First Amendment.”

Coons named the separation of church and state, but could not identify the others — the freedoms of speech, press, to assemble and petition — and asked that O’Donnell allow the moderators ask the questions.

“I guess he can’t,” O’Donnell said.

[Hacklehead]

I am not “picking on” Christine. You can kid yourself about what she said and what it sounded like but she did not give a good impression with her comment. Was Coons exactly right in what he said and how he said it? NO, but its ridiculous to pick apart a sentence spoken during a debate. Never the less I’m sure Coons sees little difference in local, state and federal govt, which is one reason I would never support him. Sure the 1A says congress shall make no law, and therefore isnt applicable to local govt, but these days the tentacles of the federal govt reach to the local govt through things like education funding. That gives them undue influence on the local schools. If the Feds say the money cant be used to teach creation, they call the shots if you want the money. Since the money comes from congress, congress essesntially runs the schools.