Replies

So you just are concerned with the extremes, not the many posts by bloggers that are just fine but then you pimpblogger pimps still hijack the threads.

Many of them do it EXACTLY like the Malkin etc threads are done.

Oh, BTW Malkin and Breitbarts sites are being promoted here when articles are posted from their websites.

And they have advertizing.

BTW Malkin and Breitbarts sites are being promoted here when articles are posted from their websites.

So what? That has nothing to do with anything. Others are posting their stuff. Malkin and Breitbart aren't pimping their personal sites for hits. Unlike with blogpimps, Breitbart and Malkin have nothing to do with some freepers' decisions to link to their sites. That is so apples vs. oranges...

Many of them do it EXACTLY like the Malkin etc threads are done.

Not exactly. In form perhaps, but NOT in intent.

Any jackwagon can create a blog. That does not make what is written there worthwhile.

These blogpimps often have nothing to impart other than a stolen video.
The rare exception has written an opinion piece based on another source.

These gems of literary insight are then excerpted in order to
get hits FOR MONEY. I'm in great favor of capitalism but only
in favor or payment for value. Usually there is none. And they USE us as an advertising platform.

Yes, Malkin and Coulter write stuff. GOOD stuff. And it is excerpted here.

I'm fine with that. But comparing THEM to the current
crop of blogpimps is not in any way a valid comparison.

Winston Churchill was a politician.
So is the corrupt county clerk of Bumsoak County, Indiana.

I like Churchill. Should I then state that I like politicians?
Including the corrupt county clerk of Bumsoak County, Indiana?