Still learning the ropes of this particular site, even though I’ve been a long-time lurker. I hadn’t heard of a “must excerpt” list. The closest thing I can see is about “vanity posting”, but since I’m commenting on a bill that will be up for public vote next month, the closest vanity is that I’m posting my article from my blog using my account here. http://www.freerepublic.com/help.htm
I no longer care about what your opinion is of my posting or method. What I care about is making sure I’m following FR’s guidelines and rules. So far I do not see proof of what you’re saying unless it’s some sort of unwritten “ethical” code posters have come up with on here.
The closest things I can find have to do with posting/excerpting news sites over copyright issues. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1111944/posts
It seems that this behavior has gone on before as noted by someone who was banned, the Conservative Examiner, over the exact same accused practices.
And it seems that you’ve pointed out this “error” to prior posters http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2596247/posts
Unless you can specifically point out a rule - with a link within this website - your accusations, opinions of my motives and claims aren’t worth squat. Viewing your recent commenting history, it’s clear that you make a habit of it.
And, as of this posting, I just discovered that you’ve been banned or suspended.
Thank you FR staff.
Dang, I hate it when that happens.
Close.
A poster "welshman007" who "writes" on the examiner blog
(Anthony G. Martin) was indeed banned. Does this indicate anything to you?
In fact, here’s a thread on that very topic.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2540034/posts
Post #11 on that thread contains prophetic wisdom, seemingly written just for you.
I'm curious, why would you submit a post to one whom, ostensibly, has been 'banned or suspended'?
hg, how ru? have a grt weeknd.
Aw, damn, humblegunner.
Again???
I’m suspended too newbie!