Posted on 10/07/2010 10:10:13 AM PDT by Mobile Vulgus
Forbes has published its world's most powerful women list and on that list, in the top slot no less, is Michelle Obama, the wife of the President of the United States of America. Along with Obama a few singers and entertainers made the list. It all goes to prove that apparently no one knows what "powerful" means anymore.
On the most powerful list after Obama at number one -- Lady Gaga comes in at seventh place, in ninth singer Beyonce Knowles appears, and bringing up the rear is entertainer Ellen DeGeneres. Oprah Winfrey makes it in as number three.
There is no reason that any of these women (well, I'll give you Oprah) belong on a "most powerful women" list -- or a most powerful anybody list, for that matter.
Michelle Obama has no power at all. She was not elected by the people to anything, she holds no office, and has no real responsibilities past tradition. She is but the wife of an elected official. Sure she has the power, such as it is, to waste millions of the taxpayer's money on new decorations and lavish trips abroad, but that is not much to qualify for a "powerful" woman. She controls no corporation, guides no country, and has contributed nothing of great worth to mankind....
More at Publiusforum.com...
She has power in the sense that as long as she sticks by her man, or at least appears to, they may stay in the White House. But if she told us what was really up with that family, that would be it!
Thank you!
The president is a Jr. so any same-named son of his would be BHO the 3rd.
You’re right. My mistake.
I guess I just don’t see that as the sort of REAL power that would put someone on a list of most powerful people. I mean using the “she sleeps with him” rule would put every wife in the wold on the same list as husbands that have REAL power and that would be rather silly, wouldn’t it?
Business. Nothing wrong with that.
USING Free Republic as a business platform is fine with you?
USING Free Republic as free advertising for a lame-ass blog is fine with you?
Informative opinion you have there. Very.
You see this all over the place a Free Republic: MSNBC, CBS, LA Times, Drudge, Townhall, websites, blogs, etc. Someone references articles from other sources. Granted there’s a fine line between advertising and providing info.
Now his blog may be lame-ass and maybe it’s not as good as Michelle Malkin’s or Dick Morris’s. But if it’s no good it will go down in flames. I would hate to pass on the great content Freepers find us from all over the place.
Then why wouldn't the blogpimp post that content here?
If the content is the thing, why not show it? Post it?
Why should a blogpimp demand a blog-hit to read it?
FR's audience is MUCH larger than any foolish blog.
The answer is in the ads. Blogpimps get paid per hit.
The pimps want to tease you into clicking on their blogs
in order to increase their hit-count. There is no other reason.
If "getting the message out" was the goal, it would be posted in full here.
Okay, I see the distinction. Thanks.
The point I was making was that she’s NOT sleeping with him but The Powers That BE want the world to think so!! And that makes her pretty powerful!! She’s there to play a role.
Well, I guess I just don’t follow. Thanks for replying though.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.