Would it be a fair question to ask "Vote for whom"?
Democrats endorsed by the NRA who most certainly would rubberstamp the next Sotomayor/Kagan nominated to the Supreme Court?
Or absolutely Pro-second Amendment Americans like Tom Coburn, who unless I'm mistaken has never gotten an NRA endorsement for his Senate seat because it's gone to his Democrat CHALLENGER - probably because of the work Coburn's done with GOA?
Joe, something ain't right here. We all know that these people are going to try to get what they want thru the courts because they can't get it in congress. The NRA has warned us about this louder than anyone else, and now they're trying to help prop up a generation of Democrats who would abolutely rubberstamp another Kagan on the court, "and rejoice in doing it", to borrow a phrase from Tony Blair.
If the NRA thinks they're going to prevail over a Sotomayor/Kagan majority on the Supreme Court (just one seat away from it) then all I've got to say is that pride goeth before a fall, baby.
NRA has done some good work thru the years and in fact is still doing some good things, or at least so I assume, but this sudden affinity for Democrats, especially now, is nuts.
I don't mean to piss anybody off, but the NRA is just wrong on the matter, and deferring to them and letting them have their way so they can someday be shown how wrong they are is wrong in itself.
I agree with you, OKScooter.
All that I can say in addendum is that the NRA has a semi for Harry Reid because he is “pro-gun”. I find that reasoning to be a little insane.
They are either blind, corrupt, or not thinking hard enough about the current political reality that exists inside the Democrat Party. I’ll let them pick which.
Good post.