Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Danae

I hear you, but I think there’s a lot of people like me that think both issues are pretty important.

I also suspect that unless we have a legal record declaring his father is kenyan-born and british, then there’s no evidence to take anything to SCOTUS.

“Lakin MIGHT be able to do so, but has thus far been thwarted.”

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. His birth certificate will only be released to a person demonstrating they have a tangible interest in verifying his DATE OF BIRTH. There’s no legal dispute on what being 35 years old at the time of inauguration means. In other words, it would be palpably illegal if Obama was serving as president and as a 34 year old usurper. I find it odd that none of these lawyers argue this.


51 posted on 10/04/2010 8:33:49 AM PDT by MissTickly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: MissTickly

You may well be right.

Who knows. I just pray that at some point something breaks and we get real verification one way or another.


74 posted on 10/04/2010 12:30:56 PM PDT by Danae (Analnathrach, orth' bhais's bethad, do che'l de'nmha.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson