[TheBigIf]

So you are just going to regurgitate the same old tired statement over and over.

I have already cited to you that the Constitution specifically delgates the power of Commander-in-Chief to the Executive. And that the Tenth Amendment specifically prohibits the States from powers delegated to the United States by the Constitution.

The Rebel democrat controlled States had no Constitionally legal right to usurp power that the Constitition gave to the United States.

[Who is John Galt?]

So you are just going to regurgitate the same old tired statement over and over.

Actually, the Ninth and Tenth Amendments are the "law of the land," not some regurgitated "old tired statement over and over."

"Learn to read you moron."

I have already cited to you that the Constitution specifically delgates [sic] the power of Commander-in-Chief to the Executive. And that the Tenth Amendment specifically prohibits the States from powers delegated to the United States by the Constitution.

So what? It's irrelevant to the issue of State secession.

The Rebel democrat controlled States had no Constitionally [sic] legal right to usurp power that the Constitition [sic] gave to the United States.

True - but the Constitution nowhere prohibited State secession, and therefore there was no violation of constitutional law.

"Learn to read you moron."

;>)