I agree with your sentiment, but not your facts.
Sharron Angle embodies the Tea Party spirit.
She is for limiting government more than any Republican running in this election season, or any other since perhaps Barry Goldwater.
I don’t know enough about Christine O’Donnell’s positions on government’s role regarding social issues, however, I do know that both Mike Kassel and Coons are non-starters. Both are bigtime supporters of the biggest authoritarian power grab in US history: cap & trade. Coons supports 0bamaCare, and Kassel doesn’t oppose it enough to want to repeal it.
O’Donnell is a vote against Cap & Trade and a vote to repeal 0bamaCare. That is good enough for me in this election.
My candidate is a baptist minister yet still seems to hold the fiscal conservative ideals we all seek.
>>I’m Tim Walberg and this is where I stand:
* I stand for our Founding Principles - belief in God, our Declaration of Independence, and Constitution...
* I stand for Freedom - to start a business, to choose your doctor, what you drive, what you eat, to carry a gun, to teach & raise your own children, and to live your own life...
* I stand for Personal Responsibility - let’s reward good behavior and discourage bad behavior...
* I stand for Limited Government, Limited, Regulation, Limited Spending, Limited Taxing, and Limited Borrowing...
* I stand for Life and all other American Traditional Values...
“The fundamental difference in this campaign is that I put my trust in the American people, and Mark Schauer puts his trust in big government.”<<
I appreciate and echo your support for those candidates, but see my post 118, especially the electoral map links. Social conservatives and their issues are a boon, not a drag.