Replies

Hi Beckwith! Good to see you!

I had posted about it at some length earlier up in the thread. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2594341/posts?page=62#62

Obama is merely taking advantage of his knowledge of Hawaii’s fraud. That is his leverage, and Hawaii REALLY doesn’t want it exposed. Here is the post in case ya don’t want to go to #62. I think its worth repeating:

To: humblegunner

Humblegunner,

The long and short of it is this.

Hawaii is covering up Citizenship and welfare fraud on a HUGE scale.

Obama got his COLB most likely the same way thousands of other babies did who were actually born somewhere OTHER than Hawaii. A late birth form filed with an address listed as the place of birth.

Now, because of THAT, Obama CANNOT prove where he was born.

If he has a Late Form or a long form with a residential address on it, he cannot prove he was born in Hawaii. Why? Because Hawaii was ACTIVELY registering babies as born within the state in order to qualify for MORE federal dollars from the U.S. Government.

Hawaii literally registered thousands of babies doing this, and a vast number of them, not having been born in the United States, have no right to the United States Citizenship they were given.

Hawaii isn’t covering for Obama. Its is covering Citizenship Fraud and welfare fraud.

Obama just happened to get caught up in that!

Maybe his grandmother made use of that if he was born in Kenya as people suspect.

Maybe his own mother did when she recognized that her baby would benefit from having American Citizenship. Maybe she did it to spite Obama Sr. for having another wife she didn’t know about, who the heck knows. One way or another, Obama has a form that does not prove his right to American Citizenship.

But THAT was an accident. That is what people have used to say, “oh yea right, like grandma knew he was gonna be POTUS one day and would need a newspaper announcement”. No. Obama’s circumstance just happened to fall in a time when the State of Hawaii was committing Welfare and citizenship Fraud.

THAT is why the republican governor is covering this up. It’s not about Obama, its about the crimes the State Committed the time of Obama’s birth and for YEARS after it as well.

Obama just happens to be shining a HUGE spotlight on the steaming pile of poo laid by the State.

Obama is TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THAT. He knows Hawaii isn’t going to admit anything, or stop covering his butt. Obama knows what Hawaii was up to and likely used it as some HARD leverage against the state.

Hawaii isn’t covering Obama. Hawaii is covering its OWN butt, Obama is just USING it to his advantage.

Post 59 is pretty good too:

To: American Constitutionalist

Yep.

The Lawyer working for the Hawaiian Democrat Party was Stanly Ann’s Lawyer in her divorce. that lawyer was working for the Hawaiian Democrat Party as well. Has been for YEARS, 15 I think it is...

He knows and likely has specific records on Barry because of that Divorce.

He knows who Barry is, knew and worked for his mom.

That lawyer is likely to know that Hawaii did engage in massive Citizenship Fraud from the time the State was ratified and became the 50th State.

That lawyer would KNOW balls to bones, that the State of Hawaii could NOT certify that Obama was a Natural Born Citizen of the United States and Constitutionally Eligible to run for and occupy the position of POTUS.

That Lawyer might be the ONLY honest player in this whole mess, other than keeping his mouth shut - lying by omission is still a lie.

He knew Hawaii could not certify Obama... and they refused to.

So Nancy now had her precious parts in a vice..... How to keep Obama on the Ballot in a seemingly constitutional manner? NOT having him on the ballot.... disqualifying him because of the lack of birth state certification was her only other choice. It was either find a way to make it APPEAR he had been certified, or take him off the ballot. Something she didn’t want to do because she WANTED him POTUS. She could work with him. I am willing to bet that she has little such good working relationships with say... Hillary... which would have been the person who would have benefited the most from that act of honesty on the part of Nancy. Somehow I don’t think Hillary and Nancy are BFF’s. There is also of course, the threats of riots if the “first black man” didn’t get the nomination... the accusations of racism... Nancy would have been the most hated person EVER by the black community, not to mention a huge number of brain dead kool-aide drinkers and ..... a HUGE number of Democrat Liberal Donors who have given vast sums of money to Obama... oh no... Nancy couldn’t NOT certify Obama.

So don’t wonder why a BIG supporter of Hillary Clinton, Phil Berg, waded into this constitutionality issue FIRST before the election! Hillary is perfectly well aware of ALL of this. I am willing to bet someone who knew someone got into touch with Phil Berg with the tip that he might be able to help Hillary get the Nomination when it was beginning to become clear that she was losing! Or maybe that friend of a friend of a someone just passed along the information to Berg just as insurance. We will likely never know. Berg has never tipped off what set him onto his path that I know of.

What Nancy did is NOT part of the legal constitutional proceedings for POTUS nominations. Her action ALONE might well invalidate Obama’s Nomination and subsequent election.

There are a rather large number of people and an entire state government invested in covering up Barack Obama’s Birth Records.

Like I said, this makes Watergate look like a kiddie pool.