Posted on 09/22/2010 10:09:35 AM PDT by Trafalgar123
wow
Well now, Russell Tanner Lexington, “What differentiates a Muslim prayer service from Jewish or most Christian services is that the prayer is a physical act - kneeling on the ground and placing your forehead to the floor.”
That must be kinda like when you get your little Obama statuette out and press your eager lips to his butt, eh?
Thought so.
He "has" done it? So is he going to do it with these kids?
A new low in leftist derangement!
I've been wondering that myself!
“So, he believes that God is a single entity (not the Trinity) and that God does not exist?”
Sounds like he’s full of ....
This is a portion of the decision on a Motion For Temporary Injunction in a graduation case I'm involved in in Federal court here in Connecticut.
“That there will not be prayer at the 2010 graduations also does not lead to the conclusion that attendance at First Cathedral for graduation ceremonies will not be “religious activity.” Plaintiffs contend, and the defendants do not dispute, that some believers see entering a church as a religious act in itself. See Motion for Preliminary Injunction at 23 (citing The Latin Mass Society of England and Wales, The Kingdom of the Beloved Son, available at www.latin-mass-society.org/2007/kingdom.html (“To pass through the door of a church already constitutes a religious act which signifies entry into the sacred. A church is the temple of God. It is not a meeting place of men but the place of worship of God.”).“
“It also appears that entering a Christian church is prohibited for some persons of the Jewish faith. For some Jews, it is “forbidden to enter the sanctuary of a church, even when prayer is not conducted.” Id. at 24 (citing Rabbi Chaim Tabasky, Prohibition to Beth a Church, Yeshiva.Org.ll, May 27, 2008, (www.yeshiva.org.iL/askleng/print.asp?id=3859.). Viewed through this lens, holding graduations at First Cathedral not only can be viewed as coercing students to enter a church and “support or participate in religion,” but can also be viewed as coercing the violation of one’s own religious beliefs.”
Ask the idiot if there’s anything wrong with taking kids to a nazi indoctrination center? There’s absolutely NO difference.
A good son would likely survey the interior for cover, egress points, where the arsenal might be located, and best positions to engage targets from....
As Russell is an atheist and would throw a crap fit if a cross is placed on the side of the road, or God is mentioned on a coin....he needs to keep his nose out of any incident relating to belief in a spiritual being which is between those who believe in a spiritual being.
He just wanted to see his name in print.
You realy have to wonder which end spewed this crap.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.