Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Forty-Niner
So in other words you back out of any bet with a definite time frame; i.e. one you would eventually LOSE and have to PAY UP. No, an indefinite time frame is what you want, waiting for the decision forever if need be. Sorry that bet is as lame as your arguments.

So you are too chicken for a real bet?

So in other words, you admit that this is all (functionally)a moot point and that 0bama will be removed from office via the ballot box as I maintain, and not EVER through any court decision saying that to be a NBC of the USA you must be born in country to two citizen parents.

So you have admitted the futility of your position. What happened to “I win you lose LOLLOLOLOLOLOL!”?

I laugh at your expense!

167 posted on 09/22/2010 6:13:49 AM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies ]


To: allmendream

LOLOLOL Nice try on turning lemons into lemonade! LOLOLOLOL

“So in other words you back out of any bet with a definite time frame”

Yes, and thats not backing out. That’s rejecting an low percentage wager.....

You’re trying to change the whole terms of the bet.

By injecting judicial review before the end of Obama’s term of Office (a time constraint) you changed the bet from right/wrong eligible/ineligible to one of looking under the black robes for B@!!s.

lolololol..... and I’m not going on that hunt with you! I know what you’ll find.....nothing of any substance!

Even in view of the fact there are now 3 females on the court, I know for certain that metaphorical cojones are in short to non-existant supply within the judicial branch, especially in the USSC.

As I said in my previous post “You really don’t expect me to bet on Judicial Courage do you?” Let’s get back to the meat of the issue.....Is Obama constitutionally eligible to serve as President or not?

Spin it whichever way you want....the fact is Obama is ineligible under the Constitution to hold the office he was elected to serve in....Constitution or not, judicial cowardice or not.

Despite your unsupportable/mislaid belief in Obama eligibility, the only real issue before the American public is what are we going to do about our error in installing Obama as President? To Dems, and apparently people like you, there is no issue at all......sigh.....hows sand feel like when wraped around your ears?

Bet? Yeah, on the origional terms and conditions....It’ll be a long wait for the results. 2 years at the inside to never on the outside.....

Be patient grasshopper! The Truth will eventually come out! It always does......

I believe that Obama will be turned out in 2012, and if re-elected, someone in the Congress will object, forcing Obama to withdraw or be forced to defend the indefenseable in court.

As an alternate scenario, I believe that Obama will not run for re-election (placing him squarely in the ranks of failed Preidencies by that simple act alone) and, after the fact, a court case will be allowed to rise up the system to the USSC Court who will re-affirm the constitutional intent and definition of NBC as born of the soil to 2 citizens.....negating Obama’s presidency in toto......


177 posted on 09/22/2010 10:45:23 AM PDT by Forty-Niner ( Give Babs Boxer a pink slip just so we can call her ma'am again I believe she's earned it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson