I went through that 'babyguide' website and could NOT find a footprint that looked anything like the one on the Lucas document.
May I run through the sequence of events one more time?
A freeper, whom I will not name (because it's up to the freeper to come forward and admit what he/she did, IMO) posted two blue footprints attached to the babyguide logo.
As the footprints looked familiar, AND BOTH WERE IDENTICAL LEFT AND RIGHT MIRROR IMAGES, I suspected that the origin was from the Lucas document itself. But checked the babyguide website anyway.
I then returned to the thread and asked the freeper/poster for the source of the image. IMMEDIATELY, the image was removed from the thread.
I then posted the image - as I had downloaded it. Why? Because I wanted to show that the two blue footprints combined with the babyguide logo HAD BEEN CREATED. I suspected this was done simply to discredit the Lucas document. And that's NOT the way we do things on FR...right?
I was then accused of fabricating the image myself. The original poster did not come forward - and still to this day has NOT. I'm still waiting.
Here is the offending image:
BOTH LEFT AND RIGHT PRINTS ARE THE SAME...SOURCE? THE LUCAS DOCUMENT.