But what the Times is really after is cutting coverage based on quality of life cost/benefit judgmentalism. Which has been Zero's plan all along.
1 posted on
09/13/2010 4:07:45 PM PDT by
wagglebee
To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; narses; Salvation; 8mmMauser
2 posted on
09/13/2010 4:08:34 PM PDT by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; Albion Wilde; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; Amos the Prophet; ...
3 posted on
09/13/2010 4:08:53 PM PDT by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
Some people really need to look up “rationing” in the dictionary. I realize it’s one of those buzzwords with plenty of connotations. But at heart it’s not a very complicated term. And it’s impossible not to have such a thing, at least outside of a true subsistance economy where it’s every man for himself. When you say you want the federal government to control cost or expand care—let alone both—you are advocating centralized rationing. No way around it.
4 posted on
09/13/2010 4:47:08 PM PDT by
Tublecane
To: wagglebee
Medicare already “RATIONS” care for seniors.
5 posted on
09/14/2010 6:31:08 AM PDT by
GailA
(obamacare paid for by cuts & taxes on most vulnerable Veterans, retired Military, disabled & Seniors)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson