A legal copy of the COLB has never been released to the public. Thats why a long-form would be valuable and necessary to corroborate Obamas claim of constitutional eligibility.
The public has the option of voting against any candidate for whom they feel that they don’t have enough personal information.
You’re about a year and a half too late in seeking corroboration and the Governor of Hawaii, the Attorney General and the Director Health have confirmed Obama’s birth there on multiple occasions.
There is only one of our Presidents for whom I know the exact time of his birth (7:24 p.m.) and the address of his parents(6085 Kalaniana’ole Highway) and for whom I have seen the newspaper birth announcements. That’s Barack Hussein Obama II.
I do not need to know if he was born in a hospital, his parents’ occupations, his parents’ birthplaces or whether the newborn was part of a multiple birth. The Constitution does not require that information to confirm eligibility.
A confirmation/authentification deposition or a notarized letter from any of those officials of the state of Hawaii would be accepted by any Court in the land.
If anyone MUST see the actual original document, go get a subpoena for it and then Obama will have no impact on its release.
No, actually they haven't ... not in a legal sense ... and you know that. Plus those people have stated demonstrable falsehoods compromising their credibility.
There is only one of our Presidents for whom I know the exact time of his birth (7:24 p.m.) and the address of his parents(6085 Kalanianaole Highway) and for whom I have seen the newspaper birth announcements. Thats Barack Hussein Obama II.
Barak Sr. didn't live at 6085 Kalanianaole Highway and you don't know if the 'exact time of birth' is accurate. It wasn't included in the newspaper birth announcements ... just like a place of birth was not included.
I do not need to know if he was born in a hospital, his parents occupations, his parents birthplaces or whether the newborn was part of a multiple birth.
We understand that you take it on blind faith and unauthenticated jpgs (hence the term 'faither'). Rational people prefer to see verifiable birth information from an original legal birth document.
BS more faulty logic process-the Constitution requires him to be a Natural Born Citizen and he is being challenged. Presentation of a notorized letter or deposition would be met with complete discovery of the subject matter. A deposition or notorized letter is not better evidence than the original contemporaneous long form record and evidence procured after hospital and doctor are known (if any) allowing further investigation for "information that could reasonably lead to admissible evidence" You have been previously advised of this fact and you continue to bloviate....you fail matchbook school of law "evidence" and "discovery".