Posted on 09/08/2010 7:21:00 PM PDT by butterdezillion
I forget if it was one of your requests or from one of the stories where Spokesbabe Okubo was interviewed (or both), but she said something about the requests were getting creative to try to get to the information about Obama's birth records and that's how they were treating most of the requests. We also know they were tracking who and where requests are coming from so they can 'identify' VRs.
He gets stopped by the police when he's driving his car - stuff like dirty license plate, any excuse they can manufacture.
Do you really think the police can't make up a plausible reason for stopping someone if they want to?
Why do you think Obama’s DOJ doesn’t want to improve the situation for this friend of yours?
For the same reason you started beating your husband - in other words, the question is a logical fallacy.
Or she could have been reading Eat, Pray, Love and Bali was on her mind.
How Kenya tell??
Can’t Kenya.
I just read this one. Wow! Great catch. I need to go read it again and get back to you!
Test.
Test successful.=)
Actual quote
“If you were born in Bali, for example,” Okubo explained, “you could get a certificate from the state of Hawaii saying you were born in Bali. You could not get a certificate saying you were born in Honolulu. The state has to verify a fact like that for it to appear on the certificate.”
http://washingtonindependent.com/51489/birther-movement-picks-up-steam
Hmmm - what does Orly say about that?
Why would you care what Orly says?? The peculiar part is that Okubo doesn’t say the state ever verified that Obama was born in Hawaii nor did she say what his official, original, doctor-signed birth certificate says about where he was born. She could be saying that Obama’s certificate should say he was born in Kenya.
FYI
Sven’s new graphic
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2589251/posts?page=21#21
To: USALiberty
SOEBARKAH MAY NOT EVEN BE A U.S. CITIZEN
(Please click link for image.)
21 posted on Tuesday, September 14, 2010 6:41:01 PM by
SvenMagnussen (Soebarkah renounced his US Citizenship in 1968.)
Because Orly has claimed the opposite.
A) The opposite of what? and B) This doesn’t explain why YOU care what Orly says.
Very interesting take on the passport application. Thanks for sharing and spreading it around...
That was in the AP article quoting Okubo. She was talking about a request I had my daughter send in, requesting birth index PAGES - saying she needed them for a school project on Chinese- and Japanese-Americans during the Civil Rights Era and needed to get names from that time.
The response was that she had to send a snail-mail request saying what name she wanted index data for.... blah, blah, blah, just showing that the request hadn’t even been read, since she wanted the page so she could GET NAMES, not because she already knew what names she wanted.
It was only after talking with Linden Joesting that I found that they still have to give copies of birth index pages, but the OIP won’t take up the issue on appeal unless the requestor has jumped through all the hoops Fukino tells us to.
The HDOH’s instruction page for requesting index DATA doesn’t say you can ask for a page from an index book but the OIP interprets a page from the index book to be “index data” so the requester has to go through the whole snail-mail song and dance, spending money to prove that the request was received because the HDOH won’t answer it unless you have proof that they got it.... etc.
So Okubo’s line about “creative requests” was actually about creative ways to try to get them to actually obey UIPA. Which nobody should have to do at all. A fact for which she apparently has no shame.
That article by Okubo could just as well have had my name written on it, because everything she said in there was a way to tell me to shut up and die.
I don’t take orders from her, though, and she will learn that soon if she hasn’t already.
The Arizona law would make more stringent requirements for what officers can check, specifically to protect against racially-based queries. The rationale for the DOJ’s resistance to that law makes no sense with what the law actually does.
The people who come here illegally are spoiling things for those who keep the laws, because everybody is suspect. If there were one or two illegals in a town people wouldn’t worry about it. If the place is overrun with them a person can’t help but wonder about everybody they see.
The fact of the matter is that as long as the border is unprotected so that Arizona is overrun with illegals, the people are going to be suspicious of everybody who looks Mexican that they don’t already know is legal. That’s just a fact of life. If Obama wanted to solve that situation he would protect the border - which he won’t do. Why is that?
Bizarre situation where my computer let me do everything EXCEPT post publicly on Free Republic for an afternoon, then later in the evening let me post, and then all day yesterday wouldn’t let me post. Hopefully it’s resolved now. But I have some catching up to do now.
Why do YOU care why I care?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.