Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: allmendream

very well stated, however the part about Khan I am not sure about. Were his armies so large?


113 posted on 09/08/2010 9:04:26 PM PDT by hecht (TAKE BACK OUR NATION AND OUR NATIONAL ANTHEM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: hecht
The armies of the Khan were not just large, but also with a supreme military advantage. His forces were all mounted archers and they need not do anything other than maneuver and fire to decimate enemy armies.

As such his genius as a general was most likely not responsible for the extent of his conquest as much as military superiority. Although he was a master of the psychology of warfare, and his greatest attack was upon the populations willingness to resist.

“They say that I am the scourge of God, a punishment sent for your sins. I tell you that this is most certainly true. You may ask what sins you have committed, and I tell you that they must have been grievous indeed if God sent ME against you!”

123 posted on 09/09/2010 5:53:13 AM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson