[wideawake]

That's the individual who attend an O'Donnell meeting to tape it. His name is apparently already known to the O'Donnell campaign. If this same individual was the individual allegedly found "in the bushes", then there is absolutely no reason for him not to be identified to the police and to have charges filed against him.

Yet the O'Donnell campaign has not done so. Why?

[MarkLevinFan]

You tell me. You seem to know all the answers.

[Springfield Reformer]

Easy. It keeps the kettle from boiling over. No doubt O’Donnell regrets ever mentioning being followed, but that’s an opening for Castle’s people to keep the issue front and center. So she steps into a trap if she goes ahead and prosecutes the privacy invader. Therefore, she wisely decides to let it go quietly, especially if she thinks there is no particular threat to her person, just an irritating invasion of privacy. She reduces her exposure on an issue that doesn’t help her. That’s a good thing.