Wow. You’re utterly destroyed at every turn in the argument, so you start throwing around names, like “Mussolini”. What’s funny here is that YOU’RE the one arguing for the states that would have people have the right the rip the skin off their subject’s flesh, send paramilitary into other states when they run away, and suppress statehood of any territory that didn’t agree with them. And when they didn’t get what they wanted from the electoral process, they launched a terrorist raid against a government fort. Yeah, I guess I’m the one who ought to be called “Mussolini” and a Soviet, aren’t I?
P.S. I’m in a red state. Where are you from, the Land of Lyndon Johnson? Bill Clinton? Al Gore?
I just figured you as a tyrant. The Saint Lincoln fan club usually includes lofty figures like Hitler. Who.. after all wants a all powerful central Government, but a tyrant? Your other points are laughable! Our opinions differ, lose? No, I rest my augment on the "consent of the governed". You on the other hand, are still stuck on that whole "slave" thing. You forget, that Britain tried that same thing with the colonist. Does that mean they fought for slavery? Who cares. You hate the founders [they owned slaves]. Your history begins and ends with Lincoln.