Polls....murkowski was ahead by 32 or 39 four weeks before the election.
that poll showing Coons 10 points ahead has been debunked on other sites. it vastly oversampled wilmingon and is completely contrary to a july poll showing odonnell ahead of Coons 41-39.
you and your RINO buddies on this site always default toward the “electable” leftist, who usually loses.
it ain’t working this year. bennett, murkowski and now castle all going down. castle is scheduled for a hard landing a week from today. LOL
Alaska is not Delaware, however. Alaska is generally conservative, while Delaware is not. Plus, four weeks is an eternity in politics - anything can happen, but not what your wishful thinking necessarily wants to see happen. Joe Miller will win in Alaska because Alaska is, at its heart, a conservative/libertarian state. Delaware is not. O'Donnell may well pull out a primary win against Castle, but she is almost assured to lose in the general. Why? Because Delaware is a centre-left state.
Why is it that simple facts like these are so hard for some folks around here to grasp?
that poll showing Coons 10 points ahead has been debunked on other sites. it vastly oversampled wilmingon and is completely contrary to a july poll showing odonnell ahead of Coons 41-39.
Okay, that's good - that's a claim that can be verified or not, and is lightyears ahead of the typical wishful thinking with no evidence nonsense you usually peddle here.
So please, provide a link to the evidence that proves that Rasmussen has now managed to "oversample Wilmington" twice in a row, and is just doing so to help RINO Mike Castle win? As in, show us the actual demographic and other internals breakdown for the polls - which you apparently have access to as a Rasmussen Gold member. Care to provide some evidence, since you claim it exists?
you and your RINO buddies on this site always default toward the “electable” leftist, who usually loses.
Oh of course - since I warn that O'Donnell won't win in November, this makes me a "RINO" who "always defaults to the electable leftist." Sure. Irony is, I'm almost assuredly more conservative than you.
One thing I am also, apparently, is smarter than you - smart enough to realise that in some states, you can run a red meat conservative and win, while in other states, you may well have to settle for a 50% with you type of guy, if it means not having the 0% with you guy in office. Again, simple logic. Why so hard to grasp?
As for my "RINO" nature, tell that to Doug Hoffman - whom I supported with my own money in his race. Or tell that to Joe Miller, Sharron Angle, Ken Buck, Dino Rossi, Tim Johnson, Rand Paul, J.D. Hayworth, Marco Rubio, Pat Toomey, Mike Lee, etc. etc. - all of whom I support or did support in their primaries, and continue to in their general election runs. Or tell that to all of the solidly conservative state level candidates here in North Carolina who I am supporting, with my time and with my money.
In other words, you simply need to shut your pie hole until you have two clues to rub together, because you don't have any idea what you are talking about. None whatsoever. In fact, you are so far from having any idea what you're talking about that it does even show up on your latest maps. Retard.