To: DJ MacWoW
You don’t have to accept anything. If we are on the path of Sodom then that was started long long ago and many of us sat by while that was happening. Gay marriage is certainly not the first step. In fact abortion was most likely not the first step.
Sodom didn’t start with same sex marriage.
37 posted on
08/26/2010 2:05:30 PM PDT by
pennyfarmer
(Even a RINO will chew its foot off when caught in a trap.)
To: pennyfarmer
Sodom didn’t start with same sex marriage. Are you suggesting that we should simply surrender to immorality?
38 posted on
08/26/2010 2:12:26 PM PDT by
DJ MacWoW
(If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
To: pennyfarmer; All
“You don’t have to accept anything. If we are on the path of Sodom then that was started long long ago and many of us sat by while that was happening. Gay marriage is certainly not the first step. In fact abortion was most likely not the first step.”
Truly it is so. Currently in the U.S. there are more hetereosexual couples cohabiting “unmarried” than there are “married.” So, the homosexual mess is just another mannesfation of a deeper problem.
40 posted on
08/26/2010 3:11:20 PM PDT by
Sola Veritas
(Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
To: pennyfarmer
You were there and know the details of Sodom’s history?
The reason homosexual activists wanted same sex marriage in the first place is to “change” (aka “destroy”) the very definition and meaning of marriage and family.
They’ve stated this themselves, many of them!
43 posted on
08/26/2010 3:47:52 PM PDT by
little jeremiah
(.Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson