Posted on 08/18/2010 8:45:05 AM PDT by Mobile Vulgus
Now, this story is a bit confusing (he says tongue in cheek). We have our friend Mr. Jim Callaghan who works -- or used to work, anyway -- for the United Federation of Teachers, America's biggest teachers union. Yet, this happy union organizer was fired by the UFT this week. Why was he fired? Because he was organizing a union.
Ah, but it's not as cut and dried as it seems because Mr. Callaghan wasn't just organizing any old union, he was trying to organize a new union comprised of the nonunion workers at the UFT headquarters.
So let's get this straight. Mr. Callaghan was a union member working for the union at its headquarters and he was fired for trying to organize the nonunion workers that work at the union headquarters?
In the real world -- one not connected with Democrats or unions -- we call that hypocrisy...
Read the rest at Publiusforum.com...
I understand their motus oporundi and can predict their moves, but I will never understand the "why" of the statist mind...
Some Unions are more equal than other Unions! Liberal Federal Govt is owned and administers of the Union, by the Union for the Union!
This is why unions should again be outlawed for public employees.
The practice of keeping bad teachers "dancing lemons," revealing the sad practice of shuffling bad teachers around the system instead of firing merely because they may have tenure on the job. While new teachers are automatically laid off due to budget cuts, teachers that have a disciplinary problem or a troubled history are kept because they've been on the job longer. This is wrong and reflects badly on the union and teachers alike, not to mention that it leads to a bad education for our kids.
What is the purpose of teacher unions? To work for children? Establish new and better requirements? Push their members to better serve parents and children?
"Despite what some among us would like to believe, it is not because of our creative ideas. It is not because of the merit of our positions. It is not because we care about children. And it is not because we have a vision of a great public school for every child. NEA and its affiliates are effective advocates because we have power. And we have power because there are more than 3.2 million people who are willing to pay us hundreds of millions of dollars in dues each year because they believe that we are the unions that can most effectively represent them, the unions that can protect their rights and advance their interests as education employees" ...National Education Association's just-retired General Counsel Bob Chanin.
NEA General Counsel Bob Chanin Says Farewell
As legendary New York teachers union leader Albert Shanker said, "When school children start paying union dues, that's when I'll start representing the interests of school children."
All government unions should be banned. The idea that government workers need protection from guess who?? THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, is ridiculous. remember, teachers are government employees. Ban government unions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.