Replies

obama has been able to block all court cases based on standing. Privte citizens do not as individuals have the right(standing) to question obama’s eligiblity. A federal grand jury could request obama’s birth records, but A.G. holder would then block and repeal the request. If you are already breaking laws , a few more means nothing.

Any state where Obama’s name was on the ballot could also launch a grand jury investigation and subpoena Obama’s birth records. For example, in Arizona (and other states as well) Obama had to sign a statement testifying to the fact that he is a natural born citizen.
The ballot eligibility statement in Arizona says: “You are hereby notified that I, Barack Obama, am seeking nomination as a candidate for the office of President of the United States from the Democratic Party, at the Presidential Preference Election to be held on the 5th day of February 2008. I am a natural born citizen of the United States, am at least thirty-five years of age, and have been a resident within the United States for at least fourteen years.”
The original document carries Obama’s signature.

Eric Holder has no impact on a state level Grand Jury investigation and there are no issues of standing on the criminal justice (fraud, election fraud, forgery, tampering with official documents, making false statements) side of the judicial system.
Finally, the Supreme Court did not reject 8 Obama eligibility appeals for lack of standing. They were all rejected at Justices’ certiorari conferences which usually means that there weren’t four justices who felt any of those appeals should make the cut as being important enough cases raising constitutional issues to be heard by the full Court. The Supreme Court listed no reasons for rejecting any of the eight Obama eligibility appeals.