Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: presently no screen name

“I never understood, if one has coverage why do they require the 65 yr old crowd to drop it and take Medicare?”

First, “Medicare has special rules that apply to beneficiaries who have group health plan coverage through their own or their spouse’s current employment. Group health plans of employers with 20 or more employees must offer these people the same health insurance benefits under the same conditions that younger workers and spouses receive.” http://www.medicare.gov/choices/employer.asp

But for employers not bound by this rule, the rationale is because 65-year olds cost much more than the average employee. Thus, it’s cheaper to rely on tax-financed health care as the primary payer and just use the employer coverage as supplemental coverage to fill in gaps in Medicare (e.g., to cover deductibles and cost-sharing or services not covered by Medicare).


71 posted on 08/14/2010 9:13:25 PM PDT by DrC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: DrC

If a company has more than 20 employees, they must continue offering their employee (or retiree) the same plan at 65+?

Or just supplemental to Medicare and Medicare is then primary?


74 posted on 08/14/2010 9:34:11 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson