I was suspicious of the H1N1 and HPV vaccines. Both were pushed too heavily for vaccine risks that were not offset by reducing chance of disease. The HPV jab states specifically that women with HPV should NOT get the jab. As children can get it upon birth, young age is not a ‘all clear’ signal, yet there was no testing for HPV prior to the jab. How dumb is that?
Think the H1N1 was designed to carry off the weak and the HPV for sterilization. Or, it’s just my tin-foil hat. But when folks are really insistent in pushing something there usually is a profit motive somewhere.
My problem is the way the article was written, it appears somewhat rambling and disoriented and diminishes the credibility. And the intrusion of the group that sees a religious cabal isn’t persuasive, either.
IIRC, the only reason Pharma made money is they had pre-sales to gov’t and liability waivers. Other countries were ditching excess supply to third world nations.
“Think the H1N1 was designed to carry off the weak and the HPV for sterilization. Or, it’s just my tin-foil hat. But when folks are really insistent in pushing something there usually is a profit motive somewhere.”
I don’t think it is tin foil hat stuff, I have interviewed the woman who is collecting stories from Mothers who lost their children after getting the shot.
The fact that these brave whistle blowers feel threatened, and Jane was fired from her job, tells me that anyone who is interested in the truth should stand up with them publicly...
the only reason Monica Lewinsky is still alive is because her story went public on Drudge back in the day...
Shine the light on the evil doers and they scurry back into the darkness.
Jen