This came up on another similar thread. The big difference is context. Laura Ingraham, like many single mothers, adopted two children from orphanages, one of whom came from a third-world country.
Aniston is answering this queustin during a press junket for her latest movie - a movie where she plays a 30-something professional who has had it with men and is going through the artificial insemination process.
I think there's a STARK difference between giving an orphaned and otherwise neglected child a loving home, and intentionally creating a child with the express purposes of NOT giving that child access to a father.
I think this is the part O'Reilly is addressing. If Jennifer Aniston wants to adopt a child, more power to her - it's a purely selfless act. BUT, if she wants to get knocked-up by a sperm donor, that's one of the most selfish things a (single) woman can do, IMHO.
I take it then you’re a strong advocate for homosexuals who wish to adopt.