Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: astyanax
"...the Supreme Court upheld a penalty imposed on an Ohio farmer who had grown a small amount of wheat, in excess of his production quota, purely for his own use."

That case law clearly needs to be overturned as soon as possible and reparations paid to all conservatives.

2 posted on 08/10/2010 9:20:32 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Paladin2

This would be the perfect opportunity for the Supreme Court to remove the “catch all” from this ruling and its impact on the commerce clause.


3 posted on 08/10/2010 9:26:29 AM PDT by astyanax (Liberalism: Logic's retarded cousin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Paladin2

“who had grown a small amount of wheat, in excess of his production quota, purely for his own use.”

Weren’t people in the Soviet Union sent to the Gulag for offences such as this? This really epitomizes the totalitarian mentality. It’s not enough to regulate every iota of goods that are exchanged with others: the state has to criminalize growing food for one’s own family or self.

It’s hard to imagine the Founding Fathers risked their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor to create a government with this kind of power to squelch freedom.


4 posted on 08/10/2010 10:55:14 AM PDT by DrC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson