Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

$6.4 Billion Stimulus Goes to Phantom Districts (does anyone know if this was this resolved?)
watchdog.org ^ | November, 2009 | staff

Posted on 08/09/2010 11:16:08 AM PDT by bronxville

...Just how big is the stimulus package? Well for one, it has doubled the size of the House of Representatives, according to recovery.gov, which says that funds were distributed to 440 congressional districts that do not exist.

According to data retrieved from recovery.gov, nearly $6.4 billion was used to “create or save” just under 30,000 jobs in these phantom congressional districts–almost $225,000 per job. The web site operates on an $84 million budget and is tasked with monitoring the distribution of the $787 billion stimulus package passed by Congress–which, for the record, counts 435 members–in early 2009... http://watchdog.org/1530/6-4-billion-stimulus-goes-to-phantom-districts/


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: stimulusmoney
Anyone know where the money ended up? I wonder if these were errors were from incompetency or deliberate?
1 posted on 08/09/2010 11:16:11 AM PDT by bronxville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bronxville

My best guess would be the coffers of Democrats running for re-election.


2 posted on 08/09/2010 11:21:43 AM PDT by Right Cal Gal (Ronald Reagan: "our liberal friends....know so much that isn't so...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bronxville

“440 districts that do not exist” isn’t a mistake, it was grand theft a million times over. People should be rotting in jail over it. But nope, I haven’t heard anything about it since it was first exposed. Even the conservative pundits dropped the ball. No investigations from conservative Republicans either, apparently.


3 posted on 08/09/2010 11:27:48 AM PDT by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
ABC NEWS, Nov 18, 2009----Stimulus grants: Why Was The White House Website Riddled With Errors?

Officials tell ABC News so far, they found 700 mistaken Congressional districts out of more than 130,000 stimulus grants. On Monday night, ABC reported on errors found on the website set up by the White House to track the number of jobs created or saved by the economic stimulus program. The website was riddled with reports of jobs in places that didn't even exist. That report prompted anger on Capitol Hill, and defensiveness at the White House. On Tuesday night's broadcast, ABC's Chief Congressional Correspondent Jon Karl took another look at the stimulus confusion (link)

LINK---Jon Karl: White House Vows to Correct Stimulus Reports Officials Tell ABC News So Far, They Found 700 Mistaken Congressional Districts Out of More Than 130,000 Stimulus Grants

SOURCE http://blogs.abcnews.com/theworldnewser/2009/11/why-was-white-house-website-riddled-with-errors.html

===========================================

Nov. 17, 2009 --- ABC NEWS' REPORTS---JONATHAN KARL, Chief Congressional Correspondent

When it comes to stimulus spending, could the wheels of government bureaucracy be grinding too quickly for once? Responding to more inaccuracies discovered in the reporting of spending and job creation from the administration's economic stimulus plan, the top White House official charged with overseeing the program vowed today to go through the reports with a fine-toothed comb and to correct the mistakes.

The promise came after ABC News found that Recovery.gov, the government Web site created to track the expenditures, had many job creation and stimulus spending figures that were attributed to congressional districts that do not exist, or that were incorrectly identified.

"The first time out, we knew there were going to be problems," said Edward DeSeve, special advisor to the president on the stimulus bill. "We don't think there are a lot of them. There are less than 1 percent in terms of the recent concern about congressional districts of the overall reports. And we've got a good commitment from the recovery board to work with us to fix them."

Officials tell ABC News, so far, they have found 700 mistakenly credited congressional districts out of more than 130,000 stimulus grants. The White House's Web site claims that more than 640,000 jobs have already been saved and created by the " $787 billion stimulus program. The reports used to come up with that number are riddled with errors.

In addition to the jobs in non-existent congressional districts reported Monday by ABC News, in real congressional districts, there are also problems, lots of them.

Moore's Shoes in Campbellsville, Ky., claims nine jobs were created from an $890 grant for nine pairs of work boots for the Army Corps of Engineers. Head Start of Augusta, Ga., claimed 317 jobs with a $790,000 grant, but it was really just a one-time raise to its 317 employees.

Chris Whitley is a fiscal officer for Central Savannah River Area Economic Opportunity Authority, which administers the Head Start program in Augusta. He says it was the administration's stimulus help line that advised them to claim 317 jobs. "It wasn't illegal, immoral or unethical. And they told me to do it, so I did it," said Whitley.

The mistakes have prompted anger on Capitol Hill. Rep. David Obey, D-Wis., the powerful chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, was outraged that one sewer project in his district was listed as creating 100 jobs. The real number is five. When asked what he thought when he saw the mistakes in his district, Obey said, "I wanted to strangle somebody."

Obey is demanding the administration fix the mistakes. "Fix the problem, the blessed problem, so that we're getting accurate information. I don't care what people's bureaucratic niceties are, or how hard it is to do it. I mean, they've got to fix the problem, so the American people can understand what the realities are.

SOURCE http://abcnews.go.com/WN/white-house-stimulus-website-riddled-errors/story?id=9110298

4 posted on 08/09/2010 11:30:21 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Liz; All

Thanks Liz I did find that article and should have posted it. You gave me an idea though from seeing it again - the reporter may have followed up - I’ll check out that angle.


5 posted on 08/09/2010 11:34:35 AM PDT by bronxville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bronxville

sfl


6 posted on 08/09/2010 12:06:54 PM PDT by phockthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bronxville

The little buggers at Recovery.gov just created an “Unassigned Congressional District” category and moved the money into that.

Here’s Missouri’s new listing:

http://www.recovery.gov/Pages/TextView.aspx?data=stateSummaryDistrictsByAmount&statecode=MO&qtr=2010Q2

Yup, there’s almost $103K in a phantom, err, an “Unassigned Congressional District.”

Cheers


7 posted on 08/09/2010 12:08:54 PM PDT by DoctorBulldog (Here, intolerance... will not be tolerated! - (South Park))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson