Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: onyx; devolve; All
Let's not forget -0's indebtedness to the Saudis ... they've been responsible for his Harvard education, probably his election along with Soros loot, and I'm sure SO MUCH MORE. ~~~~~~~~~~

"Why was Obama’s first interview as President of the United States done with Al-Arabiya instead of an American television station? The Saudis are good at covering their tracks on this. Al-Arabiya is owned by the Middle Eastern Broadcasting Company (MBC) which is privately owned, and MBC is careful enough as to not release the names of its shareholders.

MBC is widely thought to be owned by the Saudi King’s in-law Sheik Alwaleed bin Ibrahim, and therefore, the Saudi government has a direct stake in it. If this is true, then it would explain why they were able to get this first interview. Here is what we know about Obama’s Saudi backing and connection:

Percy Sutton (Malcom X’s lawyer) said in an interview that Khalid Al-Mansour was raising funds for Obama to go to Harvard. At that time, Al-Mansour was a “principle advisor to one of the world’s richest men.” This man is often thought to Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal as per the following quote from Newsmax:

“But in the lengthy interview, al-Mansour confirmed that he frequently spoke on university campuses, including Columbia, where Percy Sutton suggested he met Obama in the late 1980s, and confirmed his close relationship with Prince Alwaleed.” The African Leadership Academy, of which Al-Mansour is still on the Board of Advisors of, lists him as one of the Senior Advisors to Prince Alwaleed.

Prince Waleed is famous for trying to bribe New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani suggesting that America’s relations with Israel was the principle cause of the 911 attacks. Because Obama’s sugar-daddy of more than 20 years is truly Prince Alwaleed, it debunks the media’s fairy-tale about Obama’s humble beginnings since Prince Waleed is the 17th richest man in the world.

There is evidence “gathered by lawyers for the families of Sept. 11 victims provide new evidence of extensive financial support for Al Qaeda and other extremist groups by members of the Saudi royal family…” However, this lawsuit was shut down by the Obama Administration on the grounds of “sovereign immunity.”

Thus, the views and ideas of the Saudi Royalty are all in line with and executed through Obama’s Executive Order granting amnesty to members of Hamas within the first 30 days of his Presidency.

Obama owes so much to Prince Alwaleed that it would perhaps make Obama an “abed” or “Black Muslim slave” who is indebted to the Saudi Prince.

Putting all this information together with what appeared at Harvard, we get Prince Alwaleed’s School of Islamic Studies of which is sponsored by the Prince. Why is this important? Well, it’s a way to channel the money, isn’t it? This was probably used to kill two birds with one stone in providing Obama with tuition and to indoctrinate American kids while showing prestige in doing it.

Keep in mind that Obama is the ONLY Head of the Harvard Law Review to have never published a single article from there. Was it paid for in this manner? The speculation was that he was not good enough and Harvard Law Review did not want to be embarassed by it. One thing is for sure, Obama needed help with this one.


166 posted on 08/07/2010 11:58:48 PM PDT by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]


To: STARWISE

Oh thank you for adding that!!!!!


170 posted on 08/08/2010 12:02:38 AM PDT by onyx (Sarah/Michele 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]

To: All

Al-Arabiya is owned by the Middle Eastern Broadcasting Company (MBC) which is privately owned, and MBC is careful enough as to not release the names of its shareholders

~~~~

Forgot to add that there IS one name released as a
shareholder: Murdoch’s News Corp

“Prince Alwaleed bin Talal is a major investor in News Corp, and in return Rupert Murdoch took a 9% stake in Alwaleed’s Rotana music-to-movies TV channel empire. There have been many discussions over the past few weeks including talks between the two moguls in Beirut last week.

But it seems that News Corp’s options to take a larger stake in Rotana might already have larger ramifications. It was a Murdoch official who visited Cairo in January and laid off 49 Rotana staff. Rotana has also pulled out of a $1.5m annual rental of studio space at Egypt’s giant Media Production City and has switched production to Beirut.

News Corp certainly has options to increase its stake in Rotana, and the rumours in Cairo – wholly unconfirmed – are that News Corp wants a greater say in Rotana’s overall output including Alwaleed’s Arabic film library. The same rumours suggest that the pair want to stay in free-to-air TV at the moment, which is where the mass-market audience is.”

Read more: Murdoch gaining more control at Rotana? | News | Rapid TV News http://www.rapidtvnews.com/index.php/201004146333/murdoch-gaining-more-control-at-rotana.html#ixzz0vzx1yNjm


177 posted on 08/08/2010 12:09:43 AM PDT by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

Gosh, that’s one of my slideshow gifs and it doesn’t have the name on it!!


313 posted on 08/08/2010 12:59:07 PM PDT by potlatch (<alt=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson