[fr_freak]

I say we bring back use of words like “faggot” and “queer”. That is the only honest way of referring to people who engage in homosexual behavior, because it is the only way to confer properly the inherent disgust. Allowing the Left to sanitize certain behaviors and peoples, removing words from the language and coopting positive words (”gay”), is an Orwellian method of shaping thought. If a word for a concept is removed from the language, it makes it more difficult to express or even form the concept. Likewise, if you outlaw all terms for a behavior that have negative connotations, you remove the ability to express disapproval and disgust with the behavior, making resistance to its spread more difficult.

[little jeremiah]

Anyone who uses the word “gay” to describe people who engage in same sex sodomy is furthering their agenda. In “The Pink Swastika” the author explains that the word “homosexual” was invented by a homosexual in the latter part of the 1800s, I think in Germany, to give sodomites a feeling of “special community” and an identity. So that’s a propaganda word as well.

[Publius6961]

I say we bring back use of words like “faggot” and “queer”. That is the only honest way of referring to people who engage in homosexual behavior...

Being old-fashioned, my descriptive work of choice is "pervert."

That is still a genuine word in English, no?
I really don't care if the Urban Dictionary recently redefined it.

[Ron H.]

I say we bring back use of words like “faggot” and “queer”. That is the only honest way of referring to people who engage in homosexual behavior, because it is the only way to confer properly the inherent disgust ....

At least he didn't call them a fudge packer. My young nephew introduced me to that word a year or so back. And I thought he was just pulling my leg at the time. Imagine that, calling a fagot a fudge packer.